When a party promote an arbitration process as an alternative mechanism of dispute resolution has the expectation of an “effective justice” which can allow solve the problem without the ordinary justice obstacles. However, frequently the counter party (hardly ever the same claimant) pretend to delay the normal arbitration process through make bad practices (which are regular in ordinary justice).
These bad practices are called by the legal doctrine as “guerrilla tactics”; in that sense the present article approach the problem from the Peruvian arbitration practice, showing the readers an analysis of the main problems around the matter and finishing with a list of proposals for practitioners and arbitrators in order to discourage guerrilla tactics in arbitration.